ANALYSING STUDENTS’ ERROR IN SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE BASED ON SURFACE STRATEGY TAXONOMY AT THE THIRD GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 3 BONTOMARANNU

Authors

  • Indriana Widyaningsih Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar,Indonesia
  • Nunung Anugrawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar,Indonesia
  • Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar,Indonesia

Keywords:

Students’ Errors, Simple Present Tense, Surface Strategy , Taxonomy

Abstract

The purpose of this thesis was to analyze the types and total of error in simple present tense by using theory Surface Strategy Taxonomy. The subject of this research was the students of SMP Negeri 3 Bontomarannu of the third grade which consisted of 15 students. The research used quantitative descriptive method and used descriptive text to collect the data. To find out students' error the researcher used theory surface strategy taxonomy. The result of this research, the students still made the errors in simple present tense. The types of errors made by students in writing descriptive text was based on surface strategy taxonomy which classified into omission, addition, misformation, and misordering. Each type had total of error, 32 or 50% error of omission, 17 or 26.56% error of addition, misformation 10 error with the percentage 15.62%, and the last was 5 error of misordering with the percentage 7.81%

References

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria instrumen dalam suatu penelitian. Jurnal Theorems (the original research of mathematics), 2(1), 28-36.

Azar, Betty Schrampfer, 2002. Understanding and Using English Grammar Third Edition. New York: Pearson Education, Longman.

Brown, H.D. (1980) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

Crystal, D. (1987) the Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Data, T. P. (2015). Instrumen Penelitian. Kisi-Kisi Instrumen.

Dirgeyasa, I. W. (2017). College Academic Writing a Genre-Based Perspective. Prenada Media.

Dulay, H., Burt, Krashen. (1982). Language Two. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gabrielatos, C. (2002). EFL Writing: Product and Process.

Hasyim, S. (2004). Error analysis in the teaching of English. k@ ta lama, 4(1), 62-74.

Hendriyono, H. (2018). An Error Analysis in Question Tag Construction Based On Surface Strategy Taxonomy At The First Semester of The Tenth Grade ff Sma Mathla’ul Anwar Sindangsari South Lamung in The Academic Year of 2017/2018 (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Intan Lampung).

Herawati. (2019). Error analysis on Students’ Descriptive Writing (A descriptive Research at the Eight Grade of SMPN 26 Makassar)

Islami, H. E. (2021). An Error Analysis of Students'mastery in Simple Present Tense (A Case Study at The Eighth Grade of Mts Negeri 2 Temanggung).

Kumala, B. P., Aimah, S., & Ifadah, M. (2018, July). An Analysis of Grammatical Errors on Students' Writing. In English Language and Literature International Conference (ELLiC) Proceedings (Vol. 2, pp. 144-149).

Kurniawan, P. T. (2019). An Analysis On Students’errors Of Simple Present Tense In Writing Descriptive Texts (A Case Study Of The Seventh Graders Of Mts Assalam Bangilan–Tuban, East Java In The Academic Year Of 2018/2019) (Doctoral Dissertation, Ikip Pgri Bojonegoro).

Masruddin, M. (2019). Omission: Common Simple Present Tense Errors in Students' Writing of Descriptive Text. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(1), 30-39.

Muhsin, M. A. (2016). Analysing the students errors in using simple present (A case study at Junior High School in Makassar). Pacific Science Review B: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(3), 81-87.

Nation, I. S. (2008). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing. Routledge.

Norrish, J. (1987) Language Learning and their Errors. London: Macmillan Publisher Ltd.

Rifki, M., Rusmanayanti, A., Chandra, N. E., & Mu’in, F. (2019). A Study on The Students’ Errors in Using Simple Present Tense. Lingua Educatia, 1(2), 93-114.

Sa’diah, Z. (2018). An Analysis Of Students’errors In Using Simple Past Tense In Writing Recount Text At The First Semester Of The Eighth Grade Of Smp N 1 Adiluwih Pringsewu In The Academic Year Of 2017/2018 (Doctoral Dissertation, Uin Raden Intan Lampung).

Sermsook, K., Liamnimit, J., & Pochakorn, R. (2017). An Analysis of Errors in Written English Sentences: A Case Study of Thai EFL Students. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 101-110

Siswoyo, S. (2016). Students’ Error In Using Simple Present Tense Mastery. English Education: Jurnal Tadris Bahasa Inggris, 9(2), 461-479

Sugiono. 2008. Metode Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatife, dan R&D. Yogyakarta : Graha Ilmu

Suhono, S. (2016). Surface strategy taxonomy on the efl students’ composition a study of error analysis. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 1(2), 1-30

Syakur, A., & Rakhmawati, Y. (2014). An Error Analysis Of Using Simple Present Tense in Descriptive Writing Text Among The Eight Grade Students of SMP IT Baitul Ulum Tempel Gempol. EnglishEducation, 3(1).

Tambunsaribu, G., & Galingging, Y. (2021). Masalah Yang Dihadapi Pelajar Bahasa Inggris Dalam Memahami Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris. Dialektika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Budaya, 8(1), 30-41.

Wardiman. 2008. Descriptive text in teaching English. Teaching English 4 all on june 2010, (online), https://teachingenglish4all.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/descriptive-text/

Downloads

Published

2022-10-15

How to Cite

Widyaningsih, I. ., Anugrawati, N. ., & Ilmiah. (2022). ANALYSING STUDENTS’ ERROR IN SIMPLE PRESENT TENSE BASED ON SURFACE STRATEGY TAXONOMY AT THE THIRD GRADE OF SMP NEGERI 3 BONTOMARANNU . Journal of Applied Linguistics Studies, 1(1), 1–10. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jals/article/view/11

Issue

Section

Articles