TEACHERS’ STRATEGIES TO DEVELOP COGNITIVE DOMAIN STUDENTS’ AT SMPN 33 SINJAI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v4i3.1077Keywords:
Teachers’ Strategies, Students Response, Cognitive DomainAbstract
This study was conducted to determine the purpose of the study, namely to describe Teachers’ strategies to develop students’ cognitive domain SMPN 33 Sinjai. The subjects in this study were two teachers and six students of SMPN 33 Sinjai. The purpose of this study is to find out the English teacher strategies to develop students’ cognitive domains and to find out the students’ responses toward the strategies implemented by teachers in developing cognitive domains. The instruments used to collect data are observation, interviews, and documentation. Data analysis in this study is Analysis (QDA), Data Reduction, and Data Display.The results showed that the English teachers' strategies to develop students’ cognitive domain consisted of two strategies, namely the first is simple repetition, the second is using games to get students interested and the students’ responses toward the strategies implemented by the teacher is developing cognitive domains, namely the student response to the simple repetition strategy and the student response using games to get students interested.
Downloads
References
Amelia, L., Sitorus, A. A. M., Lubis, B. B., Harahap, S. A. F., Meha, Y., & Ardiansyah, Y. (2022). Strategi Guru Bahasa Inggris dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran di MAN 2 Model. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(1), 484-488.
Aisyah, E. S., & Sofyan, D. (2014). Perbandingan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Antara Yang Mendapatkan Model Active Learning Tipe Giving Question and Getting Answer Dengan Konvensional. Jurnal Pendidikan Mosharafa, 3(1), 12–24.
Anfa Nat Sci Edu Program, Q., Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Kependidikan Modern Ngawi, S., Sci Edu Program, N., & Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu, S. (2021). Training Natural Science Education Students as A Pre-Service Teacher In Constructing Assessment Instruments of Cognitive Domain Through Constructivist Classroom.
Igbaria, A. K. (2013). A Content Analysis of the WH-Questions in the EFL Textbook of" Horizons". International Education Studies, 6(7), 200-224.
Indriyani, L. (2019, May). Pemanfaatan media pembelajaran dalam proses belajar untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kognitif siswa. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 17-26).
Kablan, Z., & Kaya, S. (2013). Science achievement in TIMSS cognitive domains based on learning styles. In Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research (Vol. 53).
Kurniati, K., (2020). Improving Students’ Cognitive and Affective Domains Students through Fostering Teacher Development. International Journal of Contemporary Islamic Education, 2(2).
Lalogiroth, A., & Tatipang, D. P. (2020). An Analysis of English National Exam and English Teachers’ perception Using Bloom’s Revised Taxonomy. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 8(1), 1-19.
Lehrl, S., Ebert, S., Blaurock, S., Rossbach, H. G., & Weinert, S. (2020). Long-term and domain-specific relations between the early years home learning environment and students’ academic outcomes in secondary school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 102–124.
Mauliya, A. (2019). Perkembangan Kognitif pada Peserta Didik SMP (Sekolah Menengah Pertama) Menurut Jean Piaget. ScienceEdu: Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 86-91.
Mulyasa. 2007. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Sebuah Panduan Praktis. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mustika, U., & Wardah, W. (2021). An Analysis of Teacher Strategies in Teaching English. Journal of English Education Program, 2(1), 21-29.
Narottama, AOY. Pengaruh Penggunaan CD Game Flash sebagai Media Pembelajaran Berwawasan ChemoEdutainment (CET) terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Materi Pokok Larutan Elektrolit dan Konsep Redoks Siswa Kelas X Semester 1 SMA 14 Semarang. Skripsi. Semarang: FMIPA UNNES.
Nurazizah, S., Sinaga, P., & Jauhari, A. (2017). Profil kemampuan kognitif dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa sma pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 197-202.
Oktaviana, D., & Prihatin, I. (2018). Analisis hasil belajar siswa pada materi perbandingan berdasarkan ranah kognitif revisi taksonomi bloom. Buana Matematika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 81-88.
Paranduk, R., Rombepajung, P., & Karisi, Y. (2021). Enhancing Students’ Speaking Skill in Facing the Revolution Era 4.0. Journal of English Culture, Language, Literature and Education, 9(2), 103-116.
Pelletiere, C. 2009. Games and Learning. International Journal of Learning and Media. 1(1): 84-100.
Puspitorini, R., Prodjosantoso, A. K., Subali, B., & Jumadi, J. (2014). Penggunaan media komik dalam pembelajaran IPA untuk meningkatkan motivasi dan hasil belajar kognitif dan afektif. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 33(3).
Putriyani, E. (2015). The Teacher’s Strategies in Teaching English at Nursin Class in SMK Samudera Nusantara Makassar. Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. Skripsi
Qiawo, Yeung, Shen & Chu. (2022). The effects of a gamified morphological awareness intervention on students' cognitive, motivational and affective outcomes. British Journal of educational Technology.
Rahmad, R. (2021). Student Teachers' Strategies in Teaching English Online During Covid-19 Pandemic. State Instute for Islamic Studies (IAIN). Skripsi
Rahmatsyam. 2010. Peran Permainan Edukasi dalam Pendidikan di Indonesia. Prosiding Karya Tulis. Surabaya 17-19 Juli 2010
Sari, C. R., & Zainil, Y. (2020). Teachers' Strategies in Teaching Speaking English at SMA N 15 Padang. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9 (4), 733-739.
Sari, I., & Rahmah, T. (2019). Virtual Discussion for EFL Students Establishing Three Domains: Cognitive, Affective, and Psychomotor. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies. 1(3).
Tulung, G. J., & Ranuntu, G. C. (2022). Strategi guru Bahasa inggris dalam mengajar online di SMA Kristen Makale. Jurnal Elektronik Fakultas Sastra Universitas Sam Ratulangi, 35.
Tan, K. J., Ismail, Z., & Abidin, M. (2018). A comparative analysis on cognitive domain for the Malaysian primary four textbook series. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1273–1286.
Yamasari, Y., Nugroho, S. M. S., Yoshimoto, K., Takahashi, H., & Purnomo, M. H. (2020). Identifying dominant characteristics of students’ cognitive domain on clustering-based classification. International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, 13(1), 167–180.
Yang, Q. F., Chang, S. C., Hwang, G. J., & Zou, D. (2020). Balancing cognitive complexity and gaming level: Effects of a cognitive complexity-based competition game on EFL students’ English vocabulary learning performance, anxiety and behaviors. Computers and Education, 148.
Zulfiati, H. M. (2018). Sistem Among Ki Hajar Dewantara Dalam Pendidikan Karakter Di Sekolah Dasar. In Jurnal Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP Universitas Muhamamdiyah Cirebon (pp. 311-322).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 English Language Teaching Methodology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
