TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS ON THE USE OF PEER- CORRECTION AND SELF-CORRECTION TECHNIQUE TO TEACH WRITING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v3i3.269Keywords:
Teachers’ perceptions, Peer correction , Self-correction , Writing skillAbstract
This study aims to determine the teacher's perception of the use of peer-correction and self-correction techniques to teach writing. This research method is a qualitative descriptive method. Research data were collected through interviews. Data were taken from two English teachers at SMAN 5 SELAYAR.The results of the study reveal that teachers believe that Peer-Correction and Self-Correction Techniques in Teaching Writing have a positive influence on students to gain knowledge, especially in writing lessons. In addition, Peer-Correction and Self-Correction techniques are suitable for use at every level of students. The researcher also found that the teacher had an important role in determining the type of material that was suitable for the learning objectives.
Downloads
References
Ahangari, Saeidah. 2014. The Effect of Peer, Self and Teacher Correction on the Pronounciation Improvement of Iranian EFL Learners. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, Vol. 5 No. 1. 38, June 2013.
Anugrah . 2018. Teachers’ perception on the Use of Authentic Materials to Teach Listening A descriptive study at smp pgri 1 tamalate makassar. a thesis of english department, faculty of teacher training and education, makassar muhammadiyah
Ayisah, Siti, Janatun. 2013. Increasing Students’ Ability In Writing Recount Text through Peer Correction At The First Year of SMAN5 Bandar Lampung. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University.
Barrton, M. D. 2005. Rhetoric and Composition: A Guide for the Collage Writer. United State of America. Kaplan University.
Barry. (1998). A Study of Students Perception in English Classess.Vol.33 No.2. Century Education, vol. 3.1, 2016 (pp. 37-57).Descriptive Text through
Covil, Amy E. 2010. Comparing Peer Review and Self Review as Ways
Choudron, C . ( 1984). “ He Effects Of Feedback On Student’s Compasition Reisions” RELC Journal. 15: 1-14.
Darmuh, Muthia Mutmainnah. (2016). Students’ perception Towards the
Darwish, Hosam (2016). Teachers’ Attitudes and Techniques Towards EFL Edition EFL Students. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language English Language and Linguistics Research Vol.1, No. 1, pp. 32- February, 8th 2018).
Ganji, Mansoor. 2009. Teacher Correction, Peer Correction and Self Correction:
Harmer, Jeremy. 2004. The Practice of Teaching Writing. New York: Longman.
Hussein Radiyyah (2017). How Perception Affects us: The Oathways and Types implementation of peer Feedback in debate subject. Thesis.Makassar. Introduction to Psychology. Academic Press.
Hendrickson, J. (1981) “ Error Analysis and Error Correction in Language Teaching”. Singapure: RELC, Occasional Papers.
Kavaliauskiene, Galina. 2003. Correction and Self-Correction of WrittenAssigments at Tertiary Level. Journal of Language and Learning, Vol 1, No 2.
Koross, Benjamin Towett (2013). Perception of Teachers and Students
Lampung University.
Leavit, C (2002). Classroom Research Students Perception. Aila review
Lindsay P, Norman DA (1997). Human Information processing: .: An Lulu.com
Margono, S.2010. Metodologipenelitiantindakkelas.
Martilova S, Maria. (2013). Increasing students’ Accurancy in Writing
Millikan. R.G. (2004).VarietisOf Meaning. MIT Press.
Moskowitz, Marley J and Orgel, Arthur R. 1969. General Psychology. Boston: Houngton Mifflin Company. Muhammadiyah University of makassar.
Nation, I. S. P. 1990. Language Teaching for Writing Teacher. New York. Oxford University Press.
Nunn, R. 2007. The Study of Second Language Acquisition in the Asian Context. of 21st Century Writing Instruction. Teaching/Writing: The Journal of Perception. http:/blog.cognifit.com/how-perception-affects-us-thepathwa
Oxford Dictionary.(2016). Definition of perception in English.Oxford University Peer Correction at the Second year of SMP Edition). England: Longman. Peer- editing Versus Self-editing on Linguistic Accurancy of Iranian Performance. The Journal of Asia TEFL. Vol 6. No 1.
Pratiwi, Atik, Minarni. 2012. Peer Editing in the Teaching-Learning Process of Writing Descriptive Text at the Second Year of SMPN 3 Pekalongan East Lampung.Bandar Lampung: Lampung University. Press.https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/perception.
Pytash, Kristine E (2015). Writing the World: Preservice Teachers; Perceptions
Slameto. 2003. The students Perceivein Learning English. Masyarik
Studies – Vol20, No3.22 Bandarlampung. BandarLampung
Sultana, Asifa. 2009. Peer Correction in ESL Classroom. BRAC University Their Impacts On Irianian Students’ IELTS Essay Writing through Guiding Question Technique at the Second Grade of SMPN 1 Gadingrejo. Bandar Lampung: Lampung University. toImprove Collage Students’ Writing. Journal of Literacy Research, Towards Methods Used in Teaching and Learning of English University.Unpublished.Vol.42.
Sumarwati, Mulyono, S., & Wuryanti S. (2010) Tehnik Peer-Correction Berbantuan Feedback Guru dalam Pembelajaran Menulis untuk Meningkatkan Penguasaan Kaidah Bahasa Indonesia Tulis Siswakelas VIII B SMP Negeri 24 Surakarta. Laporan Penelitian Tidak Dipublikasikan. Fkip Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.
Walgito, Bimo. 2004. PengantarPsikologiUmum. Yogyakarta: 7 Writing in Egyptian Secondary Schools. International Journal for 21st Writing Skills in Secondary School. International Journal of Writing Teacher Education. Vol. 4, Issue 1 Spring 2015.
Wulandari. 2015. Improving Students’ Ability in Writing Descriptive Paragraphys and-types-of-perception-(accessed on May, 7th 2018)
Walz, Joel C. (1984) “ Correction Tehniques For the Foreign Language Classroom”. Language in Education; Theory and Practice Series No.50. Washington D.C.; Center for Applied Linguistics.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 English Language Teaching Methodology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
