STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN DIFFERENTIATING PRESENT CONTINUOUS TENSE AND GERUND OF THE FOURTH SEMESTER STUDENTS AT FKIP UKI TORAJA

Authors

  • Viktor Siumarlata Universitas Kristen Indonesia,Toraja,Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v2i3.926

Keywords:

Tense, Present Continuous Tense, Gerund

Abstract

The problem statements are formulated as follows: to what extent is the student's ability to differentiate between the present continuous tense and the gerund of the fourth semester students at FKIP UKI Toraja? In this research, the researcher used the quantitative method. The participants of this research were fourth semester students at FKIP UKI Toraja. To collect the data, the researcher used a written test in the form of multiple choice. The researcher took 20 students to Campus 1. The research results finally extended the conclusion that the answer to the research question about the ability of the fourth semester students of FKIP UKI Toraja in differentiating present continuous tense and gerund, the researcher concludes that the ability of the fourth semester students of FKIP UKI Toraja in differentiating present continuous tense and gerund, falls into the failed category.shown by the mean score of 41.4.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Comrie, Bernard. 1985. Tense. Cambridge University Press.

Damayanti. 2009. An error Analysis on the Use of Gerunds and Infinitives: A Case Study on the Second Year Students Faculty of Letters, Gunadarma University. Jakarta: Universitas Gunadarma

Duffley, Patrick J. 2003. The Gerund and the to-Infinitive as Subject. Journal of English Linguistics 31(4): 324-352.

Gaeng.1971. Introduction to the Principles of Language. New York: Michigan University. Gay, L.R.gay.2005. Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application. Columbus: Bell and Hall, Co.

George, C. E. 1990.A Comprehensive English Grammar for Foreign Students. London: Longman

Harper, Richard. Gerunds and Multiple Default Inheritance. 2000. RetrievedonNovember2006fromthewebsite:http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/d ownload?doi=10.1.1.108.5184&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

http://e-journal.sastra-unes.com/index.php/JILP. https://portlandenglish.edu/pela-blog/difference-gerund-present-participle

Murphy, Raymond. English Grammar in Use- A Self Study Reference Book For Intermediate Student, New York : Cambridge University Press. 1985.

Raflis and Arozato Lase. 2018. An Analysis Of The English Gerund As Subject, Direct Object, Subject Complement, And Object Of Preposition. Fakultas Sastra Universitas Ekasakti.

Rahmawati. 2016. An Analysis of Gerund and To Infinitive in The Articles of The Jakarta Post. Jakarta: Universitas Gunadarma

Sudjana, Nana. 2011. Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung : Alfabeta, CV.

Swan, Michael. 1995. Practical English Usage. London: Oxford University Press. Thomson, A.J. and Martinet, A.V., 1986. A Practical English Grammar. New York. Oxford

University Press.

Tiro, Muhammad Arif. 2008.Pengenalan Teori Bilangan. Makassar: Andira Publisher.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-15

How to Cite

Siumarlata, V. . (2022). STUDENTS’ ABILITY IN DIFFERENTIATING PRESENT CONTINUOUS TENSE AND GERUND OF THE FOURTH SEMESTER STUDENTS AT FKIP UKI TORAJA. English Language Teaching Methodology, 2(3), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.56983/eltm.v2i3.926