UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HYBRID LEARNING IN SEMINAR ON ELT COURSE AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAKASSAR

Authors

  • Mutmainnah Mutia Kahar Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nurdevi Bte abdullah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Eka Prabawati Rum Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56983/jcie.v7i2.1030

Keywords:

Students’ Perspective, Hybrid Learning Model, Seminar on ELT course

Abstract

This research used a qualitative approach to know students' perspectives on the implementation of hybrid learning models in the subject of seminars on ELT at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. The research subjects were BGE19 class students totaling 10 people. Data collection was carried out by conducting interviews and presented in descriptive form.The results of this study show 3 different views in several aspects. Some students have positive, neutral, and negative perspectives on the implementation of hybrid learning models on the subject of seminars on ELT at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. But most students have a positive perspective stating that this hybrid learning model is favored and expected to be applied to other subjects. It can be concluded that the implementation of hybrid learning models on the subject of seminars is preferred and expected by students. The hybrid learning model should be improved and applied to other subjects by utilizing increasingly adequate technology to make the learning process more effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aini, N. R. (2020). Model Konsep Kurikulum Berbasis Teknologi. November. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15407.36000

Anggrawan, A. (2019). Analisis Deskriptif Hasil Belajar Pembelajaran Tatap Muka dan Pembelajaran Online Menurut Gaya Belajar Mahasiswa. MATRIK: Jurnal Manajemen, Teknik Informatika Dan Rekayasa Komputer, 18(2), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.30812/matrik.v18i2.411

Bucher, H. U. (2012). Perilaku Manusia Dalam Perspektif Psikologi Sosial. Gynakologisch-Geburtshilfliche Rundschau, 44(1), 25–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000074314

Deriyanto, D., Qorib, F., Komunikasi, J. I., Tribhuwana, U., & Malang, T. (2018). Persepsi Mahasiswa Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi Malang Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Tik Tok. Jisip, 7(2), 77. www.publikasi.unitri.ac.id

Erliza, S., & Septianingsih, P. A. (2022). Undergraduate Students’ Perception of Hybrid Learning: Voices from English Language Education Students in Pandemic Era. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 7(1), 231. https://doi.org/10.21462/jeltl.v7i1.782

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, 21(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075

Fauzan, & Arifin, F. (2017). Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran Fauzan , Fatkhul Hybrid Learning sebagai Alternatif Model Pembelajaran. Seminar Nasional Profesionalisme Guru Di Era Digital, November 2017, 244–252.

Firdausi, F. J. (2020). Wacana Penerapan Hybrid Learning oleh Kemendikbud. 1(1), 1–4.

Ganovia, P., Sherly, S., & Herman, H. (2022). Efektivitas Hybrid Learning dalam Proses Pembelajaran untuk Siswa Kelas XI SMA Kalam Kudus Pematangsiantar. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(1), 1478–1481

Hidayati, L., Amalyaningsi, R., Ningrum, W. A., Nurhayati, U., & Wakhidah, N. (2022). Respon Peserta Didik Terhadap Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Learning di MTs Negeri 2 Sidoarjo. PENSA E-JURNAL:Pedidikan Sains, 10(1), 155–160. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa

Khoerunnisa, P., & Aqwal, S. M. (2020). Analisis Model-model Pembelajaran. Fondatia, 4(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v4i1.441

Klimovaa, B. F., & Kacetla, J. (2014). Hybrid learning and its current role in the teaching of foreign languages.

Krisnandariputri, I., Arkhaesi, N., & Anam, M. (2015). Pengaruh Pendekatan Blended Learning Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Sikap Siswa Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar Tentang Demam Berdarah Dengue. Jurnal Kedokteran Diponegoro, 4(4), 948–955.

Lestari, P. B., Hartati, T. A. W., & Budijanto, B. (2022). Effectiveness of Hybrid Learning Model Against Student HOTS in Learning Microbiology at IKIP Budi Utomo. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 10(3), 443. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v10i3.5174

Lestari, Syafril, S., Latifah, S., Engkizar, E., Damri, D., Asril, Z., & Yaumas, N. E. (2021). Hybrid learning on problem-solving abiities in physics learning: A literature review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012021

Meydanlioglu, A., & Arikan, F. (2014). Effect of Hybrid Learning in Higher Education. International Journal of Information and Communication Engineering, 8(5), 1292–1295.

Novitasari. (2014). Upaya Guru Dalam Meningkatkan Keberanian Siswa Untuk Bertanya Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. European Journal of Endocrinology, 171(6), 727–735. https://eje.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eje/171/6/727.xml

Prasetio, T. (2022). Umpan Balik Pada Model Pembelajaran Hybrid Mata Kuliah Ekonomi di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Perspektif, 20(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.31294/jp.v20i1.12503

Rachmayanti, R. A., & Haryanto, B. (2021). the Role of Parents in Learning Ability With Hybrid Learning Method in the Semi-Urban Community of Sidoarjo. Ta Dib : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 10(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.29313/tjpi.v10i2.8195

Riyanda, A. R., Agnesa, T., Wira, A., Ambiyar, A., Umar, S., & Hakim, U. (2022). Hybrid Learning: Alternatif Model Pembelajaran di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4461–4469. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2794

Saifuddin, M. F. (2018). E-Learning dalam Persepsi Mahasiswa. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 29(2), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v29i2.5637

Simamora, L. (2015). Pengaruh Persepsi tentang Kompetensi Pedagogik Guru dan Kebiasaan Belajar Siswa terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 4(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v4i1.136

Sudarsono, A., & Suharsono, Y. (2016). Hubungan Persepsi Terhadap Kesehatan dengan Kesadaran (mindfulness) Menyetor Sampah Anggota Klinik Asuransi Aampah di Indonesia Medika. Nature Methods, 7(6), 2016. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26849997%0Ahttp://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jne.12374

Suryani, L., Tute, K. J., Nduru, M. P., & Pendy, A. (2022). Analisis Implementasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Terbatas di Masa New Normal. Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 6(3), 2234–2244. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsesi.v6i3.1915

Tarmiji, Basyah, M. N., & Yunus, M. (2016). Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Kesiapan Guru dalam Proses Pembelajaran (Studi Pada SMP Negeri 18 Banda Aceh). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Unsyiah, 1(1), 41–48.

Tibahary, A. R., & Muliana, M. (2018). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Scolae: Journal of Pedagogy, 1(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.56488/scolae.v1i1.12

Tuapattinaya, P. M. J. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Biologi Berbasis Hybrid Learning Untuk Meningatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Smp Negeri 6 Ambon. Biosel: Biology Science and Education, 6(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.33477/bs.v6i2.171

Wahyuni, A. S. (2021). Penerapan Model Hybrid Learning. Indonesian Journal of Educational Development, 2(November 2021), 292–297. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5681376

Yudko, E., Hirokawa, R., & Chi, R. (2008). Attitudes, beliefs, and attendance in a hybrid course. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1217–1227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.005

Zainudin, Wijayanti Rica, Faulina Ria. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Hiybrid Learning Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Pada Mata kuliah IPA Kelas Rendah. Jurnal IPA & Pembelajaran IPA, 5(3), 242–249. https://doi.org/10.24815/jipi.v5i3.22029

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Kahar, M. M., abdullah, N. B., & Rum, E. P. (2024). UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ PERSPECTIVE ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HYBRID LEARNING IN SEMINAR ON ELT COURSE AT UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAKASSAR. Journal of Computer Interaction in Education, 7(2), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.56983/jcie.v7i2.1030