Fourth-Semester Students’ Perception of Online Speaking Class: Participation and Interaction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56983/jcie.v2i2.208Keywords:
students’ perception, participation, interaction, online speakingAbstract
This study aimed to discover students' perception of online speaking classes particularly about students' participation and classroom interaction using a qualitative descriptive method. The subjects of this study were fourth-semester students of the English Education Study Program, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, University of Muhammadiyah Makassar. The study used interviews as an instrument to collect in this study.Based on the results of the study, student participation in taking online speaking classes is very high, this can be seen from the activeness of students in participating starting from a high level of attendance, preparing before entering class, being active in class discussions, contributing to group assignments, and being active in their abilities. improved communication. In addition, students have a positive perspective on class interactions. This can be proven by the existence of various types of interactions during this online speaking class.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, C. V. (2021). Causes of students’ reluctance to participate in classroom discussions. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(1), 47-62.
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the distance: Online education in the United States, 2011. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.
Ambrose, S. A., Bridges, M. W., DiPietro, M., Lovett, M. C., & Norman, M. K. (2010). How learning works: Seven research-based principles for smart teaching. John Wiley & Sons.
Amiti, F. (2020). Synchronous and asynchronous E-learning. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 5(2).
Asbah, A. (2015). ANALYSIS OF CLASSROOM INTERACTION IN EFL CLASS. Linguistics and ELT Journal, 3(1), 137-150.
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of educational technology systems, 49(1), 5-22.
Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48.
Fitriani, Y., Bandung, M., & Kadri, M. K. (2020). Students’ Perspective of Online Learning on Speaking Class During Covid-19 Pandemic. Humanitatis: Journal of Language and Literature, 7(1), 1-12.
Gil, E., Mor, Y., Dimitriadis, Y., & Köppe, C. (2022). Hybrid learning spaces. Cham: Springer International.
Interaction. LDOCE. (n.d.). Retrieved June 7, 2022, from https://www.ldoceonline.com/dictionary/interaction
Johnson, S. D., Aragon, S. R., & Shaik, N. (2000). Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments. Journal of interactive learning research, 11(1), 29-49.
Kentnor, H. E. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. Curriculum and teaching dialogue, 17(1), 21-34.
Lestari, R. Y., & Fauziati, E. (2018). Classroom interaction in English speaking class: a naturalistic study at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Batang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta).
Meng, X. & Wang, X. (2011). Action Study of Teacher’s Language on EFL Classroom Interaction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(1), 98-104.
Namini, D., & Simanjalam, O. (2008). Students’ participation in English language classroom. University Malaysia Sarawak.
Noë, A., & Noë, A. (2004). Action in perception. MIT press.
Nuraini, K. (2018). The roles of teacher to promote classroom interaction in children classes. DIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Pemikiran Pendidikan, 22(1), 30-40.
Parks‐Stamm, E. J., Zafonte, M., and Palenque, S. M. (2017). The effects of instructor participation and class size on student participation in an online class discussion forum. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(6), 1250-1259.
Pohan, A. E. (2020). Konsep pembelajaran daring berbasis pendekatan ilmiah. Penerbit CV. Sarnu Untung.
Qiong, O. U. (2017). A brief introduction to perception. Studies in literature and language, 15(4), 18-28.
Rahmiyanti, R., & Zaim, M. (2020, March). Students’ Perception on Teacher’s Teaching Strategy and Its Effect Toward Students’ Motivation in Learning English. In 7th International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT 2019) (pp. 41-44). Atlantis Press.
Rakhmanina, L., Martina, F., Halolo, F. B., Syafryadin, S., & Noermanzah, N. (2020). Students’ perception on online English learning during Covid-19 pandemic era. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 3(2), 428-439.
Rohmah, T. (2017). Classroom interaction in English language class for students of economics education. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(2).
Sert, O. (2015). Social interaction and L2 classroom discourse. Edinburgh University Press.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan.
Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence-based nursing, 3(3), 68-70.
Tirtanawati, M. R., & Salsabila, D. S. (2021). ENGLISH STUDENTS PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF WHATSAPP GROUP IN SPEAKING CLASS. Journal of English Language Teaching, Linguistics, and Literature Studies, 1(1).
Tiwari, T. D. (2021). Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching of Public Secondary Schools in Nepal. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 373-386.
Tsui, A. B. (2001). Classroom interaction. The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, 120-125.
Wang, X., Elston, R. C., & Zhu, X. (2010). The meaning of interaction. Human heredity, 70(4), 269-277.
Yuliani, S. S. (2021). Students Perception Of The Online Learning Speaking During Covid 19.
Zacharis, N. Z. (2009). Fostering students participation in online environments: focus on interaction, communication and problem solving. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 6(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Journal of Computer Interaction in Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
