THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTENSITY IN USING MOBILE LEARNING TOOL IN LEARNING ENGLISH AND THE STUDENTS’ GRADE POINT AVERAGE

A Correlation Research

Authors

  • Nurhidaya Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Ratu Yulianti Natsir Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Keywords:

Intensity, Mobile Learning Tool, Learning English, Students’ Grade

Abstract

The objective of the research was to find out the relationship between intensity in using mobile learning tool in learning English and the students’ grade point average at the third, fifth, and seventh semester students of English department in Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. The research design was correlational research. The total number of sample was 60 students. The researcher used questionnaire as instrument. The research findings shown that the classification  of students’ intensity in using mobile learning tool at the third, fifth, and seventh semester students of English Department in Muhammadiyah University of  Makassar was fair with mean score 63.25, and the classification of the students’ grade point average was Cumlaude with the mean score with mean score 3.54. The researcher conclude that there was no correlation between intensity in using mobile learning tool in learning English and the students’ grade point average at the third, fifth, and seventh semester students of English department in Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.  The Pearson correlation values of students Intensity in using mobile learning tool in learning English and the students’ grade point average were 0.097, 0.132, 0.077, and 0.087

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Nurhidaya, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, English Education Department

Ratu Yulianti Natsir, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, English Education Department

References

Begum, R. 2011. “Prospect for Cell Phones as Instructional Tools in the EFL Classroom: A Case Study of Jahangirnagar University, Bangladesh” Journal of English Language Teaching. (Online) Vol. 4, No. 1, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1080334.pdf . Accessed on May 21st 2017.

Bezircilioğlu, S. 2016. “Mobile Assisted Language Learning” Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World. June 2016, Volume: 6.

Brown, H. D. 2006. Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. 5th Ed. White Plains, New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Cano, E.V. 2014. Mobile Distance Learning with Smartphones and Apps in Higher Education. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice (online).http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1045122.pdf. Accessed on June 17st 2017.

Elfeky, A.I.M., & Masadeh, T.S.Y. 2016. The Effect of Mobile Learning on Students' Achievement and Conversational Skills. International Journal of Higher Education (online) Vol.5, No. 3. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102679.pdf. Accessed on June 17st 2017.

Hayati, A., Jalilifar, A., & Mashhadi, A. 2013. Using Short Message Service to teach English to EFL Students. British journal of Educational Technology vol. 44, No. 1

Hariry, N.A.E. 2015. “Mobile phones As Useful Language Learning tools” European Scientific Journal. June, 2015 edition (online) vol.11, No.16. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1102679.pdf. Accessed on May 21st 2017

Hasmidah, 2016.The Relationship between Parents’ Educational Background and the Role of Parents to the Students’ English Language Achievement. Thesis. Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.

Herlinah, 2016. The Correlation between Students’ Listening Strategies and Their Listening Achievement. Thesis. Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.

Muhammed, A.A. 2014. “The Impact of Mobiles on Language Learning on the part of English Foreign Language (EFL) University Students” Global Conference on Linguistics an Foreign Language Teaching LINELT. (Online) Accessed on June 5th 2017

Nallivetil, G.M., & Alenazi, T.H.K. 2016. The Impact of Mobile Phones on English Language Learning: perceptions of EFL Undergraduates. Journal of Language teaching volume 7 No. 2

Pegrum, M.O.G., & Faulkner, R 2013. Schools going Mobile: A study of the adoption of mobile handled technologies in Western Australian independent schools. Australian journals of education and technology.

Putri, M.W. 2012. Perbedaan Indeks Prekstasi Kumulatif Mahasiswa berdasarkan Gaya Belajar yang Kongruen dan Inkongruen pada Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Angkatan 2009. Thesis. Salatiga: Satya Wacana Christian University.

Sugiyono. 2016. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Woodil, G. 2011. The Mobile Learning Edge: Tools and Technologies for Developing Your Teams. New York: McGraw –ltill Companies. (Online) http://libgen.io/ads.php?md5=602FEBD393A049CC427FA0612FE22C7C.

Wulystan, et al. 2012. Using Mobile Phones for Teaching and Learning Purposes in Higher Learning Institutions: the Case of Sokoine University of Agriculture in Tanzania. Proceedings and report of the 5th Ubuntunet Alliance annual conference. (Online) https://repository.ubuntunet.net/bitstream/handle/10.20374/130/mtegaw.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed on June 5th 2017

Young, R. 2008. Using Technology Tools in the Public School Classroom. A Research Paper for the Master of Science in Education: University of Wiscounsin-Stout.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-28

How to Cite

Nurhidaya, & Natsir, R. Y. (2018). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTENSITY IN USING MOBILE LEARNING TOOL IN LEARNING ENGLISH AND THE STUDENTS’ GRADE POINT AVERAGE: A Correlation Research. Journal of Computer Interaction in Education, 1(1), 51–64. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jcie/article/view/947