GURU PENGGERAK AND NON-PENGGERAK TEACHER PERCEPTION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROBLEM BASED LEARNING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING

Authors

  • Agus Salim Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nurdevi Bte Abdul Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Asri Jumiaty Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v4i2.1049

Keywords:

Problem-based learning, Guru Penggerak, English language teaching

Abstract

This research aimed at finding out Guru Penggerak and non-penggerak teacher perception on the implementation of problem-based learning in English language teaching. The method of this research was case study. Data of the research were collected through observation and interview. This research was conducted at SMA Negeri 8 Makassar with two teachers as a subject. The subject was divided into Guru Penggerak and non-penggerak teacher. The techniques of data analysis were data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing/verification. The findings of this research showed that in syntactically implementing Problem-based learning is the same between the Guru Penggerak and non-penggerak teacher. But individually as teachers there is a distinction between Guru Penggerak and non-penggerak teacher in teaching process. Guru Penggerak tends to give freedom to her students to collaborate, creatively, and express their ideas. While non-penggerak teacher tend to focus more on achieving the learning objective based on lesson plan. In addition, the distinguishes between Guru Penggerak and non-penggerak teacher is their difference perceptions in implementing problem-based learning. Different experiences, teaching method and point of view very visible from the teachers. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Agus Salim, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT FACULTY TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION 

Nurdevi Bte Abdul, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

Andi Asri Jumiaty, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Indonesia

English Education Depertment, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education

References

Afdareza M, Yuanita P, Maimunah M. (2020). Development of Learning Device Based on 21st Century Skill with Implementation of Problem Based Learning to Increase Critical Thinking Skill of Students on Polyhedron for Grade 8th Junior High School. Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(2).

Hardika Saputra (2020, April, 27). Pembelejaran Berbasis Masalah (Problem Based Learning). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/340950123. Perpustakaan IAI Agus Salim.

Jannati P. (2023). Peran Guru Penggerak Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar. Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidayah 7 (1).

Kemendikbud. (2019). Program Guru Penggerak. Https://sekolah.penggerak.kemendikbud.go.id/gurupenggerak

Loppies M, Badrujaman A, Sarkadi S. (2021). The Effect of Problem Based Learning Models in Online Learning Settings On Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes In History Subjects. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5 (1).

Nur’aini. (2020). Penerapan Metode Studi Kasus Yin Dalam Penelitian Arsitektur dan Perilaku. INERSIA Vol. XVI:1

Orey, M. (2010). Emerging Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Technology. Zurich: The Global Text Project.

Sutikno, et al. (2021, Juli). Penelitian Kualitative. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/353587963_PENELITIAN_KU ALITATIF

Rusman. (2014, Juni). Penerapan Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Edutech, Tahun 13, Vol.1, No.2, Juni 2014

Sugiarsi. (2020). Instrumen Penelitian Kualitatif. publikasi.aptirmik.or.id

Yani, K. (2012). Studi Kasus (John W Craeswell). http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPIPS/JUR_PEND_SEJARAH

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Salim, A., Bte Abdul, N., & Andi Asri Jumiaty. (2024). GURU PENGGERAK AND NON-PENGGERAK TEACHER PERCEPTION ON IMPLEMENTATION OF PROBLEM BASED LEARNING IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHING. Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 4(2), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v4i2.1049