STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON ENGLISH TEACHING USING A VIRTUAL SYSTEM ONLINE LEARNING

Authors

  • Andi Sri Fatul Rahma Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Nur Qalbi Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
  • Farisha Andi Baso Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

Keywords:

students’ perception, English learning, Google Meet

Abstract

The objectives of this research were to find out the students’ perception of the use of Google meet application in English learning at eleventh grade students of MA Guppi Samata Gowa. The researcher used quantitative descriptive research. The sample of this research was eleventh grade students of  MA Guppi Samata Gowa which consist of 20 students. The sample was taken by using questioner with Google form. Based on the findings, it was found that students gave positive perception on the use of Google meet in teaching English, the positive response came from their experience in learning process. The result of the research indicated that based on the Likert’s score analysis there were 12 (85,7%) out of the students was categorized positive perception in which score classification is 42-70, beside that there were  2 students (14,3%) had neutral perception and none of students have negative perception. It was categorized that Google meet used in teaching English effective to apply, it helps the learning teaching process in the class. The recommendation for the future research to conduct a research related to the using of Google meet in teaching and learning procces such as kahoot, as the advance of tecnology keep increasing time by time.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amberg, j. S., &Vause, d. J. 2009.American English: history, structure, and usage. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.

Anderson, T. (2004).Towards a theory of online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 2, 109-119.

Apuke, o. D. 2017. Quantitative research methods a synopsis approach. Arabian journal of business and management review (Kuwait chapter), 6(10).

Bailey, Kathleen M. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. New York: The McGraw-Hill

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principles. San Francisco: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.

Chien, s. Y., Hwang, g. J., &Jong, m. S. Y. 202.Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & education, 146, 103751.

Dung, D. T. H. (2020). The advantages and disadvantages of virtual learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 10(3), 45-48.

DwiWahyuni. 2016, The Effectiveness of Short Movie for Teaching Speaking, Kalimanah .Indonesia

Asold, r. W., &Connor Linton, j. 2006.An introduction to language and linguistics. New york: Cambridge university press.

Fitrah, m., &luthfiyah. 2017. Metodologi penelitian: Penelitian kualitatif, Tindakan kelas & studi kasus. Sukabumi: cvjejak.

Fitriani. 2010. Methodology Penelitian pendidikan “ Usaha Rational”. Surabaya. Indonesia

Helaluddin, & Wijaya, h. 2019.Analisis data kualitatif: sebuah tinjauan teori dan praktik. Makassar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Hassani, k., Nahvi, a., & Ahmadi, a. 2016.Design and implementation of an intelligent virtual environment for improving speaking and listening skills. Interactive learning environments, 24(1), 252-271.

Izenstark, A., & Leahy, K. L. (2015). Google classroom for librarians: features and opportunities. Library Hi Tech News.

Kassim, s., Witkin, n., & stone, a. 2019.Student perceptions of virtual reality use in a speaking activity. Call and complexity, 223.

McBrien, J. L., Cheng, R., & Jones, P. (2009). Virtual spaces: Employing a synchronous online classroom to facilitate student engagement in online learning. International review of research in open and distributed learning, 10(3).

Muthmainnah Amil. 2020 .Students’ Perception on The Use of Suggestopedia Method To Teaching English .Makassar, Indonesia.

Neuman, B. C. (1992). The Prospero file system: A global file system based on the virtual system model.

Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology: A Textbook for Teachers. London: Prentice Hall International Ltd.

Picciano, A. G. (2017). Theories and frameworks for online education: Seeking an integrated model. Online Learning, 21(3), 166-190.Accessed June 28, 2020.

Rashid, r. A., Mohamed, s. B., Rahman, m. F. A., & Shamsuddin, s. N. W. 2017. Developing speaking skills using virtual speaking buddy. International journal of emerging technologies in learning (ijet), 12(05), 195-201.

Robbins, Stephen P. ( 2003). Perilaku Organisasi. Index. Jakarta

Sadiman, A. 1993.Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sanaky, H.A. H. 2009. Media Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Safiria Insania Press.

Shaharanee, I. N. M., Jamil, J. M., & Rodzi, S. S. M. (2016).The application of Google Classroom as a tool for teaching and learning. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering (JTEC), 8(10), 5-8.

Saul Carliner. (2004). An overview of online learning.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung Alfabeta.

Tarigan, 2008.Berbicara sebagai Suatu Keterampilan Berbahasa. Bandung: Angkasa.

Walgito, Bimo. 2004. Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: 70

Downloads

Published

2021-12-10

How to Cite

Rahma, A. S. F. ., Qalbi, N., & Andi Baso, F. (2021). STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON ENGLISH TEACHING USING A VIRTUAL SYSTEM ONLINE LEARNING. Journal of Computer Interaction in Education, 4(2), 1–15. Retrieved from https://jurnal.fkip.unismuh.ac.id/index.php/jcie/article/view/132

Most read articles by the same author(s)