The Correlation Between Students’ Visual Learning Style Preference and Vocabulary Mastery at SMP NEGERI 3 Sungguminasa

Authors

  • Ferra Fakhirah Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar,Indonesia
  • Hasnawati Latief Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar,Indonesia
  • Muh Arief Muhsin Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar,Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v3i2.363

Keywords:

Correlation, Vocabulary Mastery, visual

Abstract

The objective of this research is to find out the correlation between students' visual learning style preference and vocabulary mastery at SMP Negeri 3 Sungguminasa. The design of this research is descriptive quantitative research. This research has two variables, students' visual learning style preference as an independent variable and students’ vocabulary mastery as a dependent variable. The population of this research is seventh-grade students. The researcher used random sampling to take the samples, which consist of 33 students. In collecting the data, the researcher used a questionnaire and test. The questionnaire used to measure students’ visual learning style preference, which consists of 15 statements. Then, the test is used to know students’ vocabulary mastery which consists of 20 questions. In analyzing the data, the researcher used Pearson analyzed Product Moment Correlation formula. The data analyzed by using  SPSS 23 program for Windows. The result of this research shows that there was a medium correlation between students’ visual learning style preference and vocabulary mastery of VII grade students of SMP Negeri 3 Sungguminasa because the value of rxy = 0.468 on the correlation scale table (0.40-0.599) means in medium correlation level. As the findings showed, rxy > rtable = 0.468 >0.40  So, it can be concluded that there was a significant correlation between students’ visual learning style and vocabulary mastery at SMP Negerei 3 Sungguminasa

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Gilakjani, A. P., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2011). Paper title: The effect of visual, auditory, and kinaesthetic learning styles on language teaching. In International conference on social science and humanity (Vol. 5, pp. 496-472).

Kazemi, S., Mahdavi-Zafarghand, A., & Tahriri, A. (2016). The relationship between learning styles and vocabulary recall among sensorineural hearing loss EFL learners. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(4), 325-346.

Maga, A. (2020). The Relationship between Students’ Visual Learning Style Preference and Their Reading Comprehension at the Second Year of SMP N 9 Pekanbaru (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).

Maulana, M. I. (2020). The Correlation between Learning Style and Students' Vocabulary Mastery of the First Grade Students at State Junior High School 3 Tambang (Doctoral Dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau).

Nunan, D. (2005). Practical English language teaching: Young learners. New York: McGraw Hill Companies.

Oksattridywi, M. (2017). A Correlation of Learning Styles and Vocabulary Achievement. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 6(10).

Padidar, H. A., Tayebi, G., & Shakarami, A. (2015). The relationship between learning styles and vocabulary learning and retention. Spectrum, 4(1).

Sahabuddin, R., & Thaha, S. (2018). Effect of Visual Learning Style and School Climate on Students' achievement of Learning Entrepreneurship At SMKN 1 Palangga. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3), 1-13.

Suaib, R. W. (2017) The Use of Visual Auditory Kinesthetic (VAK) Learning Styles to Increase Students’ Vocabulary. A Thesis. Makassar: PPs UNM.

Yaqin, M. A. (2015). The Correlation Between Students’ Visual Learning Style Preference and Reading Comprehension at the Tenth Grade of MAN Kunir Wonodadi Blitar

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Fakhirah, F., Latief, H. ., & Arief Muhsin, M. (2023). The Correlation Between Students’ Visual Learning Style Preference and Vocabulary Mastery at SMP NEGERI 3 Sungguminasa. Journal of Language Testing and Assessment, 3(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.56983/jlta.v3i2.363